Metaphysical Animals: How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life

Product Information

A truly detailed exploration of the lives of four of the women who broke philosophical ground at Oxford, and a close examination of their thoughts about philosophy, religion and politics. However, I was confused at times by the choice of using first and last, only first, or only last names. Neither the great Enlightenment thinkers of the past, the logical innovators of the early twentieth century, or the new Existentialist philosophy trickling across the Channel, could make sense of this new human reality of limitless depravity and destructive power, the women felt.

Mary’s teacher, Jean Rowntree (granddaughter of the Quaker philanthropist, Joseph Rowntree), had reassured her concerned parents that it would be safe and that any dangers posed by fascism would be balanced by improvements in Mary’s German. The privations that the protagonists undergo seems a piffle compared to the everyday life of comparable people in India. In the mid-twentieth century Elizabeth Anscombe, Mary Midgley, Philippa Foot, and Iris Murdoch were philosophy students at Oxford when most male undergraduates and many tutors were conscripted away to fight in the Second World War. Further, whilst the book is understandably focused on how the four thinkers as outstanding female philosophers influenced each other, readers are offered only the most sparing information about how their thought was also affected by the various men in their intellectual circle.Written with expertise and flair, Metaphysical Animals is a vivid portrait of the endeavours and achievements of these four remarkable women. Bring[s] to life an important episode in intellectual history, and [has] made me again grateful that I was for a time a contemporary of these unforgettable women. Given that the code of Bushido might oblige the Samurai to turn the sword on himself, one can sympathise with his need to test its keenness. But the devotion of the fellows to scholarship and to the success of their students was uncompromising. Readers learn about the four's college life and are offered a pen picture of Oxford University during WWII .

As an amateur evolutionist I am also reading Mary Midgley’s The Solitary Self: Darwin and the Selfish Gene with enjoyment as well as Murdoch’s The Nice and the Good, especially for a character based on Philippa.Together, these young women, all friends, developed a philosophy that could respond to the war's darkest revelations. War also made certain ways of thinking more pressing, including the rights and wrongs of human actions – individually and collectively. Women on the other hand, Midgley maintained, were more likely to be embroiled in intimate relationships with partners and friends, be engaged in their communities or have experienced the raising of children. Metaphysical Animals ] makes a much-needed case for the value of philosophy to life as a whole, and for the reader's own interest in pursuing such a life for oneself.

All this was ahead of them as Mary sat cross-legged on Iris’s floor that first term, Iris lying on her bed surrounded by books and flowers, penning an enthusiastic letter to a schoolfriend. There are tons of facts in this volume for those who are interested in who lived where when, but there is ultimately very little about the work these women created and the influences they had on those who followed.Stories that rival in passion and intrigue anything that Elena Ferrante’s Neapolitan Novels have to offer and contain much to interest specialists as well as general readers. Speaking as Dean, she warned that any misstep, any rule-breaking or scandal, would injure not only themselves but future generations of aspirant women scholars.